I have found that many historical conclusions are wrong and are proven so by the passing of time and the availability of recordings after that historical event. In the last eighty years, historians and publishers have found themselves like-minded and have taken this opportunity to draw conclusions that are contrary to the facts. They do this to put forth “history” that agrees with their political views and not the facts; this is because the logical conclusions are embarrassing to their favored party. These political views are almost always liberal and the home of liberalism – the Democratic Party.
There used to be three major parties: Republican, Democrat, and Communist. Yes, people registered Communist. Famously Lucile Ball registered that way when she was about twenty years old. She was heavily under the influence of her kindly grandfather. She only heard the good stuff. When she met Ricky Ridardo, who had to flee Havana, Cuba, as the Communists overtook Cuba, murdering many of his friends and family, she learned the truth. Death always follows communisum. It’s cheap with them. When they saw they were going to be relegated to the dustbin of history after WWII, they had to merge with another party. The one they had the most friends in was the Democratic Party. The one thing Communists learned early was that the ability to misinform was more powerful than the largest armies. So they emphasized education and media centers. And look at the lies they can tell and get away with. They even have an ex-Director of the CIA who voted communist before applying to the CIA. He wondered if that would keep him off. Nope, that was a career builder.
Once history has been bent and published to suit their goals, it is then deemed “settled,” which means that every reporting of history thereafter will use them as references. And they must conform to them, or they will be shouted down by the all-powerful media.
History must be recorded without political or other influencing traits; it shouldn’t take on the traits of propaganda. This is the reason that history must be resolved with logical and common-sense conclusions: Thus, the need for HistoryResolved.com
Currently, I have found myself joining the ranks of the elders. As such, I have the opportunity to RESOLVE some of the many errors in the recording of historical events because I have first-hand contemporaneous knowledge of them. This means I can blend historical events with my oral history and hopefully lend them legitimacy. My oral history will be my aging memory. Unfortunately, I didn’t write down footnotes as I lived life, so I don’t have them to tryto prove my points. But my efforts will be to add points left out of the original stories or events that might change the storyline greatly.
Of course, oral history is an oxymoron; history means recorded events, oral ones exist only briefly in the air and profit only each person who hears it. If the events are not set in stone, so to speak, then how do we know it is accurate?
Historians today, propagandists, will try to disprove my conclusions using the overused tool of minutiae pounding. They will find some unimportant bit of the story and pound and pound on it, trying to change the “story” to it. I can’t cover every little detail in my posts. These are distractions and distortions and will not be a factor in the primary supposition.
A prime example is my essay titled; What’s wrong with the Republican Party: from Lincoln to (but not including) President Trump..