Police Code of Silence? NOT!

All you need to know:
The disproportionate amount of attention given to law enforcement officers, which is almost always negative, by the news media gives people the feeling that more is “at play” than there is. The media is not hesitant to bait others into saying or doing what they themselves wish, usually to the detriment of the baitee. If the persons can’t be baited, then the media will twist their words.

The media wants to portray the police in a way that falsely gives the impression that police selectively enforce the laws and give more attention to a crime if the victim is white and less attention if a prostitute or homeless person is involved. Especially if the suspect is not white. This is ridiculous. Officers are predominantly law-abiding, civic-minded soccer moms or dads. Their goal is to be happy with their family and friends. It is not going to work to be evil and cruel; someone completely the opposite of when at home. It’s the news media, the reporters, the writers, and especially the producers who have much more in common with crooks than law enforcement.

Details:
The current prejudice against police officers is glaring. Just look around at current events. If someone makes an allegation against an officer, it is assumed true by the weight of this prejudice. All one has to do is make an allegation against the police, and the media instantly picks it up and reports it as true. And if it can’t be proven true, then it must be because the officers are hiding behind a “blue wall of silence.”

There is no vast understanding among all officers to lie to defend other officers’ actions. In today’s world, police officers are the first to turn in dishonesty by fellow officers. Police officers are usually building careers that include promotions. If a carpenter is arrested for shoplifting, it isn’t news; if a police officer is arrested, it is news. Police bad conduct is disproportionately reported.

If a police officer is making an arrest for some crime, it goes to reason that that person would be willing to lie if it could help themselves.

Years ago, individual police officers began audio recording their activities. This was after the advent of small recording devices. The reason was that if someone made a complaint against the officer, there was an audio account. Once played in front of the accuser, the complaint was usually dropped. Of course, police misconduct happens, and it is being addressed aggressively, as it should be. Officers should be held to a higher standard, just not the standard of perfection. There will always be those who become officers for the sole reason to commit crimes.

The public’s attention is naturally drawn to officers and their actions. When the Rodney Glen King (police misconduct was recorded by a private person, see that incident) incident occurred, I heard more than one TV news report suggest that “If this was recorded by chance, how often do they really occur?” Nearly everyone has a camera now, and nearly everything an officer does is recorded. Where is the avalanche of misconduct by police officers?

Keep in mind that when someone makes a complaint against an officer, it is often because the officer has been called there to keep the peace, settle a dispute, arrest someone, and/or protect the prey against the predator. There is almost always someone infuriated by officers, and thus a possible complaint. Many times, the person being preyed upon is black, as is the suspect. There is much more black-on-black and black-on-white crime than white-on-black.

Today, most agencies have a very good ratio of black officers to white ones. I’ve heard many complaints that an agency has placed too many black officers in their predominantly white sections and too few in the predominantly black ones. FACT: many black officers don’t want to work in black neighborhoods. Why? Because they are treated very harshly in black sections.

Trivia time, just for fun:
An off-duty LAPD officer went to a little bar in a medium-sized beach town on the coast of Southern California. While there, it became known to some drunk college types that he was an off-duty police officer. He wisely left the bar. He was followed by five men who confronted him and threatened to beat him. (P.S. all involved were white) Knowing he was about to be beaten, he drew his weapon and warned the men. Being drunk, they ignored it. He fired a round into the parking lot pavement. Being drunk, the men continued toward him until he shot one of them. Dead, as it turned out.

Local police from Huntington Beach investigated the incident. The man who was shot died. The other men claimed that the officer shot without a warning and without provocation. The investigators failed to find the spent slug from the officer’s warning shot. The officer was arrested. LAPD Internal Affairs began an investigation. In cases like this, the norm is for the police department to wait until the criminal complaint is adjudicated before starting its Trial Board. The criminal trial took nearly a year to begin. Meanwhile, the officer was held in jail because he couldn’t post bail. No one came to his aid. The Los Angeles Police Protective League will often help, but not this time.

By law, LAPD has only one year to adjudicate their civil case, and since that date was approaching, they convened a Trial Board before the criminal trial. Their procedure allows an officer to have another officer represent him as an advocate during the board. An officer’s “attorney,” if you will. That officer visited the scene in the beach town to search for the slug that should be in the parking lot’s pavement. The LAPD Trial Board Advocate searched and searched for it. Eventually, he found it. He called the local police to pry it out of the pavement so it could be compared to the officer’s gun, which was being held as evidence by them.

Ballistics proved that it was the warning shot fired from the officer’s weapon, just as he claimed. When confronted with this finding, the other men crumbled and admitted that they were lying. All criminal charges were dropped along with LAPD’s charges.

It’s unknown if the lying witnesses were arrested.

In recent times, the best way to get ahead in a police department is to “burn” another officer. This is especially true in large agencies. It is because of this, and their discrimination against police officers, that they didn’t find the evidence.

In another instance:
A woman living in South Los Angeles was getting lewd phone calls, lots of them. She complained, and the phone company placed a wiretap on her phone. This was back in the day when wiretaps were done. The phone number was traced to an LAPD officer who lived not far from her. He was arrested for the misdemeanor, and the LAPD convened a civil Trial Board. His defense advocate (an LAPD officer of his choice to serve as a pseudo-attorney) was frustrated because it was an open-and-shut case, yet the officer kept claiming his innocence. As time dragged on, his wife divorced him.

During the trial, the LAPD officer representing the city called the phone tech who did the original phone trace to the stand. On the stand, he confirmed that he did the trace and it was accurate. When it was the defense’s turn, his rep also asked the tech if he did a phone trace and read what it was. He took out his notes and read the number out loud. The officer grabbed the defense rep’s arm, pulled him down, and whispered into his ear, “That’s not my phone number.” And it wasn’t. The phone company transposed the last two digits when looking up the number’s owner.

Because of prejudice against their own officers, the LAPD was only too eager to demonstrate to the public that they don’t condone such actions. The officer was presumed guilty. Wrongly, he had been arrested, lost his family, and nearly lost his job over this careless mistake. His pay had been stopped months before, so he suffered financially in addition to everything else.

As it turned out, the correct number belonged to a known sex offender.

Okay, just one more, even more serious:
At the outcome of the Rodney King incident, the sergeant in charge was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon and other add-on charges. Stacy Koon, the sergeant, after serving most of his two-year sentence, was transferred to a halfway house. A normal procedure when releasing a felon back into the public. Local media published the transfer location. Some time later, a black man armed himself and went to that house. Koon was not there. Not able to find Koon, the man opened fire on two completely innocent white people, killing them. They were vendors stocking the machines.

The modern media fans these inaccurate flames of hate. Any black person can attack an officer (white or black) and claim reverse racism. Many deadly attacks on police have been blamed on perceived racism. In Baltimore, MD, when a black arrestee died in the back of a police van, it was claimed to be because of racism by the officers. The officer driving the van was just transporting the arrestee. The arresting officer was black. The transporting officer was black. The police commissioner was black. The mayor was black. But the media allowed the thread of racism to mingle with the facts. And rap music stars, don’t get me started. NWA (_igge_ With an Attitude, today we can’t even mention their name) Tupac, Little Biggie, Snoope Dogg all admit they got their start by selling drugs to neighborhood children and others. But they claim they were harassed and preyed upon by the police because they were black, not for being drug dealers. Even when the officers were black.

Jussie Smollett

When did this story start to smell like two-day-old fish???? It was when the perpetrators yelled (in Chicago) “This is MAGA country.” Huh. Where in Chicago is MAGA country? What street? What tiny little section? If the perpetrators yelled this, they would have been attacked and beaten before getting a block away.

What’s the real reason for the kid glove treatment of Jussie? Because it is black vs. white racism. Nearly all involved are black people, and they want to slap whites in the face by trivializing this. How will this keep America great: Trading one sin for another. Republicans fought the Civil War to make all equal. Liberals, Democrats want to cover up their slave history by making blacks slaves all over again; to government programs. This time by giving them superior rights and making Republicans pay.

It’s pandering to get votes. Then they put into place programs that hurt the black community. This flood of hate has to stop.

BTW: When was America great? When we stopped the NAZIs and communist from taking over the world, all the while stopping Japan’s invasion of Asia; it is called WWII.

Evergreen College steals thousands of public dollars to wrongly terrorize a farm.

Evergreen College in Washington state used thousands of dollars of public school funds to bus people 178 miles to terrorize a farm that had an employee die. The “college” (environmental terrorist) wrongly claimed that a farm’s working conditions caused the death, later determined to be natural. The college now wishes to offer an apology to the public from which it stole the money and to the farm that had to deal with terrorizing demonstrations. In any other situation, jail would be appropriate and jail should be the remedy here along with restitution. The college, who knew at the time of the demonstrations that they were illegally using public money, wants us to trust that they handled the situation internally. After all, the faculty thieves were given a strong “reprimand.” A strong “don’t do it again, oh no, the theft was okay, but don’t get caught again.”

The liberal intellectually superior collegiate ilk feel that their superiority should bar them from the same rules that we mortals must live by. If this was a conservative institution it would be demanded that people lose their jobs and people go to jail. The money must be paid back.

 

What’s wrong with the Republican Party: From Lincoln to, but not including, President Trump

“It is said that history is written by the winners,” George Orwell. But not so in the USA, it is written by Democrats who dominate in the education and publishing fields.

President Lincoln and the American Civil War is one example where “what really happened,” plus common-sense conclusions do not equate to what the history pundits teach us. This history must be resolved by filtering it with common sense interpretations and the passing of time; that is history post the Civil War and post President Lincoln. But when we tell the truth we are called “mean-spirited,” because it is so detrimental to the Democrat Party’s image. And if there is one thing the Republican deep-state does not want (so it appears) it is to be called “mean-spirited,” by Democrats and liberals. This terminal malady is being treated (finally) with the election of President Trump who disregards political correctness. Yet the historical records need to be corrected. Today, politicians want to press their advantage of being in control with unfettered influence. They do everything they can to bend the “common-sense,” approach to fit their various corrupted enterprises. President Trump was stopping this gravy train.

President Lincoln sealed his own fate when he insisted on having a Democrat nominated as the Vice President on the GOP ticket for his re-election bid in 1864. To do this Lincoln had to quit the GOP (Republicans were against it) formed a political party of his own, and nominated himself as President and Andrew Johnson (a Democrat) as Vice President: Who becomes arguably worse president ever. Then Lincoln offers to rejoin the GOP if they accept his ticket. This was done, and the GOP had a Republican nominated as President and a Democrat nominated as Vice President. There is no common-sense explanation for his bizarre actions. This can only be explained as Civil War “political correctness,” much like what the Republican Party of today tolerates. Lincoln’s compromises cost tens of thousands of lives. Here’s how:

Because of this compromise, after Lincoln’s assassination, the Confederate States of America, who are primarily populated by Democrats and loses the war, winds up holding the office of the President of the United States of America. This was planned at the highest ranks of the Confederacy. It was planned that after the assassination Johnson would become the President and then cease the war in favor of the South. What wasn’t planned was the South losing the war before the plot could be carried out. We know that the president of the Confederate States authorized the assassination of Lincoln using the argument that Lincoln first authorized his assassination. Of course, we know that Lincoln did no such thing and his reputation alone would deny this rumor. Now, President Johnson wasted no time in thwarting the desires of his dead loyal friend, Lincoln. He showed his true colors as a traitor in his lenient dealings with the South. He was impeached for future actions and came within one vote (due to bribery to acquit) of being ousted.

It’s well documented that John Wilks Booth traveled to Canada where the “CIA” of the Confederacy operated openly. It is known that he received a payment from them. This is where the obvious is abandoned — by “historians” – and takes on a Democrat bias. The assassination plot targeted not just the President, but the Vice President (the Democrat) and the Secretary of State as well. The assassination of Lincoln was tasked to the most competent of the gaggle, Booth. That of the Secretary of State by the next most competent. Indeed, when the attack on Secretary Seward went awry, caused by a gun’s failure to fire, the assassin resorted to knife and bludgeoning. He was overwhelmed by Seward’s staff and Seward barely survived the vicious attack. However, the assassination of VP Johnson was not even attempted; no action taken whatsoever. The cover story was that the assigned assassin backed out at the last minute and went to a local bar and got drunk. Can we all say, “yeah right?”

When Booth fled, after the assassination, he was tacked down by the army. The soldiers were commanded not to fire upon him and take him, prisoner– at all costs; a vital and irreplaceable prisoner. Booth was cornered and was about to be burned out of his hiding place and taken prisoner. Against the standing orders, a shot rang out and Booth laid dead. The shot was fired inexplicably by a Sergeant. With Booth’s death, the only direct link to the South’s assassin plan was erased. No doubt this Sergeant was among the South’s spies.

In the North spying, espionage, and other traitorous affairs were very common. Fourteen Senators were expelled for sympathizing with the South. Southern sympathizers infiltrated nearly every aspect of the North’s affairs and reported back to the South when able. Washington D.C. was in a slave sympathizing state, Maryland. Just across the Potomac River was Virginia and not far away was the capital of the Confederacy Richmond. Washington D.C. was an island surrounded by Confederate sympathizers.  The nearest Union territory was a hundred miles away. The only reason Maryland didn’t cede with the other states was that they knew that the North would immediately invade them to capture and keep the capital from becoming a hostage.

When the war began it was the North that had a standing army and with it had an administration, a chain of command, quartermasters to supply it, and all the other logistics necessary for war, the South didn’t. When it came time to choose a leader for the Army of the Potomac, Lincoln chose General Irwin McDowell at the urging of Salmon Chase. The loyalties of Chase and McDowell came into question after the war. During the 1864 presidential election and while the civil war was still raging, Chase attempted to get the nomination for president as a DEMOCRAT.  He lost to General McClellan (more about him later).  The Democratic platform called for the immediate end to the war: essentially giving the South the win. McClellan campaigned vowing to continue the war. However, he had already made known his desire to end the war and let the South cede. His so-called change of heart was, no doubt, words only in an attempt to get the soldier’s vote. It failed.  They must have had support in the South to attempt this. The Democratic party was heavily influenced by the sheer number of Democrats that lived in the South.

Back to McDowell, he explained his ineptitude at 1st Bull Run by claiming he needed to get more supplies, get additional soldiers. and the recurring excuse that he wanted to be cautious. Let’s just call this “McDowellism.” Lincoln had to order him to attack. Lincoln wanted the attack before the South could organize. McDowell stumbled and bumbled around for an additional two days,  thus, he gave the South much-needed time to call their militias up and organize a line of defense. He failed to demand even minimal military discipline from his men allowing them to straggle to the battle’s location on their own. He had no experience for the job, he was a Quarter Master. The Union had many West Point graduates and men with combat experience. This was an inexcusable choice, no doubt, pressed upon Lincoln by someone he trusted, Chase.

The plans for McDowell’s attack were leaked to a spy who delivered them to the South’s army. Even though McDowell had the larger and better-trained army he bumbled into an attack and was soundly defeated. He was promptly demoted to a field general’s role. Then again at the battle of Second Bull Run his command became “lost in the woods,” and failed to get into position for the attack by the Union army. Even then he questioned and delayed orders. One commanding officer, General Pope, stated of McDowell, “God damn McDowell! He’s never where he’s supposed to be!” There was much talk of him being a traitor. McDowell was then sent to California where he could do little harm.

Lincoln continued to make errors in his choices to lead the army. Under his generals, Irvin McDowell, George McClellan, Joseph Hooker, and George G. Meade, the army had more defeats than victories.

Under Lincoln’s policy of being all-inclusive, he promoted General George McClellan to replace McDowell as the commander of the Army of the Potomac, whose adversary was General Lee. This was despite McClellan’s openly disdain of Lincoln and his hatred of abolitionists. (As stated above, McClellan would run against Lincoln’s re-election bid in 1864, as a Democrat. His platform was to allow the South to cede and end the war at once; the exact goal of the Confederacy. In other words — SURRENDER. Yet, Lincoln appointed him despite his known beliefs.

Before the Battle of Antietam, the battle plans for Lee’s army came into the hands of the Union Army, and thus, McClellan. Who promptly refused to take full advantage of them because he feared they might be fake. He needlessly delayed his army’s deployment to Antietam by a day which gave General Lee valuable time to fortify his defense and get reinforcement. McClellan had a two-to-one superiority in numbers over Lee’s army, but he used the excuse that he thought Lee had many more troops than he did. This “estimate,” existed only in his own mind and was not based on any intelligence. It was contrary to the facts at hand. During the battle, McClellan only committed three-quarters of his soldiers and held the rest in reserve. Despite this voluminous reserve, when one of his generals was making good progress and had victory in sight, all he needed was reinforcements, McClellan claimed he had none when in fact he had two fresh corps in reserve. The Union army had the momentum. The army of the South was routed; unable to fall back and form a defense line. Total victory was at hand. A route is always followed by a never-ending attack. The attacking army can easily pick off the opposing army piecemeal.  But, McClellan stopped the attack and allowed the South to escape. Lee’s army was able to fall far to the rear where they had additional support and could set up a line of defense. The generals under McClellan wanted to press the attack, Lincoln wanted him to press the attack: In fact, he gave McClellan a direct order. McClellan inexcusably disobeyed the order. This opportunity to win the war meant that another 250,000+, men would needlessly die. There is no logical excuse for McClellan’s actions other than those presented here. His loyalties were to the South.

Men like McClellan justified these traitorous actions because they saw themselves as nation builders. In other words, he, General Hooker, and General Meade all suffered from McDowellism.

At last, Lincoln noticed a general out west that was winning battles: In fact, he gave the Union their very first major victory. Ulises S. Grant, a Republican, cured the army of its McDowellism. Now the Union had a general who believed in the war’s noble principles and was loyal to the Union and Lincoln. He had two generals under him that shared the same enthusiasm, Generals Sheridan and Sherman. All three picked off pieces of the South’s army until General Lee had to break and run. This time the attack was pressed, Lee was run down and his army fled the battlefield pell-mell in a rout. The war was over. This is what would have happened at the battle of 1st Bull Run (the very first battle) and Antietam. Both McClellan and McDowell disobeyed direct orders given by Lincoln. And in each case, hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved.

Lincoln had just been re-elected, the war was over, and one would expect Lincoln to be able to savor the moment. He did. His mistake in insisting that a Democrat share the victory as the VP candidate was just another blunder that cost the USA dearly, but Lincoln even more.

When the war started the Confederacy had thousands of sympathizers already living in the North. They are a people without morals. Not only did they believe in slavery they fought and killed and died to keep slavery. It was cancer in the USA.

Republican’s desire to be the nice guy, to go over and above what would normally be called for, makes them utterly unable to compete. President Trump’s victory was the Republican rank and file telling the deep-state Republicans that we don’t want to play the fool for Democrats. In 1934, Joseph Stalin realized the Communist Party in the Christian USA, could not prevail. One cannot be a Communist if one believes in Christ; It’s in the book. He then instructed his communist to infiltrate the existing political parties. Guess which one they infiltrated. Right, both. They have now taken over the Democratic Party and infiltrated the Republican Party enough to sabotage it. They almost staged a coup. Had Clinton been elected it would have been the end of Democracy. The Democrat-controlled Oligarchy in the USA would be in control and able to direct investigations to smother the opposition. The purse strings of the USA would be open to them.

History Resolve’s Definitions with Comments

Dictionary

Conservative:
One who knows right from wrong, usually does right, occasionally wrong, but then gets back on the right road.

Liberals:
One who refuses to admit what is right or wrong, HATES those that do, and blocks those who try to do right.

Politically Correct Defined:
Information, conduct, and/or support that is completely controlled by the mainstream media; always aiding liberals and their causes while libeling conservatives and their causes.  These goals are the same as those for the communist party, thus, controlled by the communist party.

McCarthyism: 
Once believed to be persons in the media or entertainment fields who were wrongly accused of being communists, and thus, their livelihoods were gravely damaged. With the correction of the passing of time, it has now been proven that indeed the spread of communism in those fields was extensive, just as he thought. And using the drumbeat of McCarthyism, they have deflected the truth and have kept most ignorant of their communist leanings until today, when they are obvious.

Many patriots have suffered much damage due to the communist media’s slandering of the news.